<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: R is for review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sherylhs.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/r-is-for-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sherylhs.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/r-is-for-review/</link>
	<description>A day in the life plus some assorted thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:51:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Radioactive Jam &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cat&#8217;s pea strain</title>
		<link>http://sherylhs.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/r-is-for-review/#comment-5498</link>
		<dc:creator>Radioactive Jam &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cat&#8217;s pea strain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 02:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sherylhs.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/r-is-for-review/#comment-5498</guid>
		<description>[...] and I first &#8220;met&#8221; during last year&#8217;s NaBloPoMo; she was in the midst of visiting and reviewing &#8220;R&#8221; blogs* and said some very nice things about one of my posts. I enjoy reading [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and I first &#8220;met&#8221; during last year&#8217;s NaBloPoMo; she was in the midst of visiting and reviewing &#8220;R&#8221; blogs* and said some very nice things about one of my posts. I enjoy reading [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reddirtroad - sad to see it go&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://sherylhs.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/r-is-for-review/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>reddirtroad - sad to see it go&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sherylhs.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/r-is-for-review/#comment-242</guid>
		<description>[...] Next time, I think I&#8217;ll go even farther and help out with the cause. Either donate a prize or help out with the reviewing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Next time, I think I&#8217;ll go even farther and help out with the cause. Either donate a prize or help out with the reviewing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reddirtroad</title>
		<link>http://sherylhs.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/r-is-for-review/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>reddirtroad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 21:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sherylhs.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/r-is-for-review/#comment-232</guid>
		<description>Well, I was thinking about helping out. Is the Fussy NaBloBoMo list up to date or is it just the list of those who wanted to participate? And the Randomizer... is that currently being updated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I was thinking about helping out. Is the Fussy NaBloBoMo list up to date or is it just the list of those who wanted to participate? And the Randomizer&#8230; is that currently being updated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: learninghorses</title>
		<link>http://sherylhs.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/r-is-for-review/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>learninghorses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 07:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sherylhs.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/r-is-for-review/#comment-230</guid>
		<description>Way to REVIEW! I have gotten more entertainment out of the reviews and the randomizer in the last month than I have gotten out of TV in the last year.  NaBloPoMo RULES! (thank God its almost over).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to REVIEW! I have gotten more entertainment out of the reviews and the randomizer in the last month than I have gotten out of TV in the last year.  NaBloPoMo RULES! (thank God its almost over).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sherylhs</title>
		<link>http://sherylhs.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/r-is-for-review/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>sherylhs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 18:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sherylhs.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/r-is-for-review/#comment-228</guid>
		<description>Hey reddirtroad,

1.  There were 78 participants and 29 of them had missed a day or more, so that leaves 49 still posting everyday.  Of the 29, I didn&#039;t track who quit posting all together.  I don&#039;t think it was many.  Even tho there was one person who didn&#039;t even bother to post once the whole month.  Also, I should note, that was as of Nov 17 /18th.  I don&#039;t know if anyone else is out.  I&#039;m reviewing the t&#039;s now. (I&#039;m crazy, I know.)  

2. I don&#039;t know if the sites are using a NaBloPoMo category.  I myself didn&#039;t think of using that tag until at least a week in and plus sometimes I real bad a tagging stuff.  Mostly I just clicked on the November archive link and flipped through all the posts looking specifically at the dates.  Unless they had a posting calendar - those rock.  This was by far the most challenging of all the items I looked at.  I really feel for M. Kennedy, I don&#039;t know how she is going to separate the &quot;dids&quot; from the &quot;did nots&quot;.

So now a question for you:  Are you doing a similar review or are you just a curious one?  If you are doing something similar I will give you one hint.  I went to the NaBloPoMo list and viewed the source code.  I then copied all the participants names and site addresses into Excel and created a spreadsheet to work off of.  It made it pretty easy to determine where I left off and who was doing what.

I hope I&#039;ve answered all your questions.  If not, just ask.

Jeez, this was long enough, it could have been a post for today. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey reddirtroad,</p>
<p>1.  There were 78 participants and 29 of them had missed a day or more, so that leaves 49 still posting everyday.  Of the 29, I didn&#8217;t track who quit posting all together.  I don&#8217;t think it was many.  Even tho there was one person who didn&#8217;t even bother to post once the whole month.  Also, I should note, that was as of Nov 17 /18th.  I don&#8217;t know if anyone else is out.  I&#8217;m reviewing the t&#8217;s now. (I&#8217;m crazy, I know.)  </p>
<p>2. I don&#8217;t know if the sites are using a NaBloPoMo category.  I myself didn&#8217;t think of using that tag until at least a week in and plus sometimes I real bad a tagging stuff.  Mostly I just clicked on the November archive link and flipped through all the posts looking specifically at the dates.  Unless they had a posting calendar &#8211; those rock.  This was by far the most challenging of all the items I looked at.  I really feel for M. Kennedy, I don&#8217;t know how she is going to separate the &#8220;dids&#8221; from the &#8220;did nots&#8221;.</p>
<p>So now a question for you:  Are you doing a similar review or are you just a curious one?  If you are doing something similar I will give you one hint.  I went to the NaBloPoMo list and viewed the source code.  I then copied all the participants names and site addresses into Excel and created a spreadsheet to work off of.  It made it pretty easy to determine where I left off and who was doing what.</p>
<p>I hope I&#8217;ve answered all your questions.  If not, just ask.</p>
<p>Jeez, this was long enough, it could have been a post for today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reddirtroad</title>
		<link>http://sherylhs.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/r-is-for-review/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>reddirtroad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 07:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sherylhs.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/r-is-for-review/#comment-225</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks for the mention. A few questions...

1. Do you know how many R&#039;s are still participating?
2. Are there many sites participating that are using a NaBloPoMo category/tag or did you just hunt around in archives or did you go back and read every single post for the month?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for the mention. A few questions&#8230;</p>
<p>1. Do you know how many R&#8217;s are still participating?<br />
2. Are there many sites participating that are using a NaBloPoMo category/tag or did you just hunt around in archives or did you go back and read every single post for the month?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sherylhs</title>
		<link>http://sherylhs.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/r-is-for-review/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>sherylhs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sherylhs.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/r-is-for-review/#comment-219</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad everyone seems to like my reviews.  Thanks everyone for stopping by.  I have really enjoyed your blogs as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad everyone seems to like my reviews.  Thanks everyone for stopping by.  I have really enjoyed your blogs as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hope</title>
		<link>http://sherylhs.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/r-is-for-review/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Hope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 03:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sherylhs.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/r-is-for-review/#comment-212</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad that you like my layout! It&#039;s someone else&#039;s initial design, but I changed it up a bit for my site.

I&#039;m impressed that you went through all of those blogs. That&#039;s a lot of reading. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad that you like my layout! It&#8217;s someone else&#8217;s initial design, but I changed it up a bit for my site.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m impressed that you went through all of those blogs. That&#8217;s a lot of reading. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sammy</title>
		<link>http://sherylhs.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/r-is-for-review/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sherylhs.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/r-is-for-review/#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Hey!  Thanks for mentioning me!  My mom really got me into blogging and now, what can I say?  I&#039;m hooked!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey!  Thanks for mentioning me!  My mom really got me into blogging and now, what can I say?  I&#8217;m hooked!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alyndabear</title>
		<link>http://sherylhs.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/r-is-for-review/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Alyndabear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sherylhs.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/r-is-for-review/#comment-203</guid>
		<description>Glad you had fun doing the R&#039;s. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you had fun doing the R&#8217;s. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
